Click here for PDF. Ruling on Costs [1] The parties have finished a personal injury civil jury trial which arose from a motor vehicle accident of December 26, 2015. The trial was fought over liability, causation and damages and continued over 21 days. The plaintiff succeeded in having the jury Read more…
Click here for PDF. Issue [1] The Appellant disagrees with the Director’s May 9, 2017 decision that he is not a person with a disability, as defined in section 4 of the Ontario Disability Support Program Act, 1997 (the Act). The Director determined that the impairments were not substantial and Read more…
Click here for PDF. Overview [1] The applicant, V.L., was injured in a motor vehicle accident on March 10, 2014. V.L. sought benefits from the respondent, Pafco, pursuant to the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule – Effective September 1, 20101 (the “Schedule”). [2] Pafco partially denied V.L.’s claim for the cost Read more…
Click here for PDF. Issue [1] The Appellant disagrees with the Director’s December 14, 2015 decision that she was not a person with a disability, as defined in section 4 of the Ontario Disability Support Program Act, 1997 (the Act). The Director determined that the impairments were not substantial and Read more…
Click here for PDF. Decision [1] Leave to appeal is granted. Overview [2] A. L. (Claimant), completed high school and qualified as a practical nursing care aide. She worked in this job until she was injured in a number of car accidents. She applied for a Canada Pension Plan (CPP) Read more…
Click here for PDF. Issue [1] The issue under appeal is whether the Appellant continues to be a person with a disability. The Appellant did not appear for her hearing but her counsel was present. Her counsel indicated that he had been in contact with the Appellant and had been Read more…
Click here for PDF. Wilton-Siegel J. (Orally) [1]The applicant, Aviva Canada Inc. (the “applicant”), seeks judicial review of the appeal order made August 24, 2017 of the Director’s Delegate Jeffrey Rogers (the “Director’s Delegate”) of the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (the “Order”). The Order partially rescinded the arbitration award Read more…
Click here for PDF. Overview [1] Z.M. (‘the applicant”), was injured in an automobile accident on October 5, 2013, and sought benefits pursuant to the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule – Effective September 1, 20101 (“the ‘Schedule”). [2] The applicant applied for benefits from the respondent (“Gore”), and then applied to Read more…
Click here for PDF. Overview [1] The applicant was injured in an automobile accident on December 21, 2017 when his vehicle was rear-ended by another vehicle. He then sought benefits from the respondent pursuant to Ontario Regulation 34/10, known as the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule – Effective September 1, 2010 Read more…
Click here for PDF. Overview [1] [The applicant] was involved in an automobile accident on February 22, 2015, and sought benefits pursuant to the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule – Effective September 1, 20101 (the ”Schedule”). [2] The applicant applied to the Licence Appeal Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) when the disputed benefits Read more…