We have dedicated our careers to fighting insurance companies on behalf of people who have been seriously injured and those families who have lost a loved one through the carelessness of others. We believe that our team’s compassionate approach combined with our determination to achieve outstanding results, will help you and your loved ones through this time of crisis and protect your future. If you have suffered a serious injury due to someone else’s negligence, contact us today. Your consultation is free.
Congratulations to Purva Vaidya on her new success at the Social Benefits Tribunal where she was able to secure access to benefits for her clients. The Tribunal is satisfied that the Appellant is a person with a disability within the
meaning of subsection 4(1) of the Act.
SBT File Number – 2302-00915
Congratulations to Purva Vaidya on her new success at the Social Benefits Tribunal where she was able to secure access to benefits for her clients.
Congratulations to Purva Vaidya and Nidhi Vinayak for successfully arguing at the Social Benefits Tribunal that our clients are disabled and are in need of income support.
Congratulation to Nidhi Vinayak on her new success for Tribunal orders.The Tribunal is satisfied that the Appellant is a person with a disability within the
meaning of section 4(1) of the Act.
SBT Decision 2302-00808
Good Luck to Mark Stoiko who is in the middle of a jury trial in Kitchener, to Georgiana Masgras who is in the middle of a LAT hearing on the issue of whether the applicant sustained catastrophic impairment as defined in the SABS and to Andrew Franzke who is starting a LAT hearing next week.
click here for PDF. Overview [1] The applicant, SL, was involved in a car accident on November 4, 2016 and as a result, he alleges he sustained physical and psychological injuries. Because of those injuries, Read more…
Click here for PDF. Ruling on Costs [1] The parties have finished a personal injury civil jury trial which arose from a motor vehicle accident of December 26, 2015. The trial was fought over liability, Read more…
Click here for PDF. Issue [1] The Appellant disagrees with the Director’s May 9, 2017 decision that he is not a person with a disability, as defined in section 4 of the Ontario Disability Support Read more…